[...] or read the transcript. Then tell me there isn’t any bias and I’ll tell you that I have a bridge up in Alaska to sell [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Flopping Aces

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Flopping Aces

Like or Dislike: 0  0

When Obama and Biden are up in their Washington clouds and making it rain cash soup isn’t it the job of lower elected officials to hold out bowls for their constituents? Somehow I don’t see McCain/Palin being so eager to tip the pot and start pouring. Thanks for your efforts btw.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

H-M-M-M-M-M!LET`S SEE. A PROPER ANALOGY OF “MTV?”

HOW ABOUT: MINDLESS TURDBRAINED VOIDS!

WALAH!! PERFECT DESCRIPTION HUH!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

HILLARY`S FUMIN` WHILE BILL WANTS HER PHONE NUMBER!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Mata harley is dead on with his/her/info. on the next female President of The United States of America!What I loved(one of many points in her speech)was her reference to the “good ole` boys club” in Washington and how she didn`t care what the leftwing liberal media machine thinks of her,or about throwing back cocktails with the corrupt liar`s club either.She`s going to Washington to serve,WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, not: US AND OUR PATHETIC,SPINELESS IDEAOLOGY AND OVER-INFLATED EGO!!THAT`S THE WHOLE DAMNED PROBLEM WITH THAT RAT HOLE CALLED “CONGRESS AND SENATE”,IT`S FULL OF STUPID PC,SPECIAL-INTEREST-LOVIN` LIBERALS!!!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] and the spout about saying no to the "bridge to nowhere"? Where’d the money go? Flopping Aces

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Rich, it is you who misses the point.

I am afraid that you are missing the main point. What she said at the convention with great bravado was that she turned down the bridge project out of strong philosphical belief that earmarks are wrong.

If that were the case, then she would not have weighed the financial and political considerations, but rather turned the money down from the very beginning because it was a federal earmark.

One more time…. s-l-o-w-l-y…..

The money came in, and Congress no longer looked at those funds as a bridge earmark…. BEFORE Sarah took office. Now how you can ask a woman to turn down federal funds for a bridge project that were received by the state BEFORE she was in office, is beyond comprehension…. yours, that is.

That $200 mil, in the Alaskan treasury so to speak, was no longer “bridge to nowhere” funds, but federal funding for transportation projects. Palin used that money for other needed transporation improvement projects, as laid out by advisors and analysts.

That aside… the original bridge problem still remained. The Ketchikan community needed better access to the airport, and Gravina Island needs growth stimulus with that access.

Palin listened to her transition analysis team, the Alaskan themselves, considered other access alternatives, and chose a route that did not require asking Congress for ANY federal funding. Which is why she said “thanks, but no thanks”. Had she presented another cost effective access plan, they could have gone to Congress to fund that as an earmark project.

Instead, as she said, if they want a bridge, they’ll build it themselves. I believe they are favoring a more efficient ferry system instead.

So she *did* turn down the bridge project, because she would not let it go forth, nor allocated Alaskan taxpayer dollars to fund it.

She is correct. You only hear what you want.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Here a Moby,

There a Moby,

Everywhere a Moby Moby.

It’s like someone kicked the top off of an ant hill.

They’re digging and parsing and dissecting every sentence ever written and every statement ever made looking for something that will rescue their Messiah.

Palin is right over the target, the flak is flying, and the inhabitants of the Leftward fever swamps are squirming in angst and anguish as they watch their HopeyChangfulness slip from their grasp.

The polling numbers are beginning to roll in now. The race is back to dead even for the polling period before last night’s speech. Obama’s train is coming off the track, hence the emergency 5am e-mail this morning.

The wolves in the media and here on the Net have done whatever they could do since last Friday to find a weakness in regards to Sarah Palin. Any weakness.

They even attacked her children. Her CHILDREN! with the most vile, scurrilous, sewer dwelling smears in the history of American politics. Unbelievable.

Is this the “change” that B-Rock has been touting? If so, I’m sure that America wants no part of it.

Sarah Palin demonstrated last night steely eyed, firm footed, unflappable resolve, poise, dignity, and confidence even in the face of TelePromTer issues and CodePinko demonstrators trying to storm the stage just as she was delivering the “Lipstick” line.

The two individuals who attempted to disrupt Palin’s speech last night are none other than Jodi Evans, and Medea Benjamin, Marxist. Together, they founded CodePinko.

Jodie Evans is one of Uh-bama’s top money producers. I wonder if he’ll denounce her behavior. I won’t hold my breath waiting. He never has before.

The MSM and the sub-human animals from the Left have failed.

They underestimated this breath of fresh air from the great state of Alaska.

Like or Dislike: 0  0