[...] compete in the arena of qualifications… so he eliminates competition by removing them, either from the ballotor through disgracing them with public public smear [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] shouldn’t be surprised about this. Obama has a long history of strong arm tactics and shenanigans. But the MSM is in full court defense mode by spinning these [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

It is amazing how many people dismiss the warning signs of a man who believes he has no equals. when you look at he people Obama has surrounded himself with, If you look at his voting record(when he was actually there to vote), If you look at how he changes his views depending on who he is talking to. If you look at the dual meaning of his words…………… People like Jeannie are draw in by the hype. Sure he gives great speaches but there is no substance to his words. See how quickly they dismiss this, without even considering the fact that these people have had a profound influence on the O-mans thinking.

It’s always instructive to take a look at the
people who endorse Obama or have been his
associates:
Besides Ayers, Dohrn, Fonda, Castro, Chavez, and
Zawahiri, here are a few others:

Hamas
Larry Flint
ACORN
Louis Farrakkan
Rev. Wright
Michael Phleger
Anarchists for Obama
Ludacris
Tony Rezko
Black Panthers

See any pattern here?
They’re all thugs, extremists, misogynists,
terrorists, racists, convicted felons, communist
despots, Islamic fundamentalist jihadis, or obscenity-spewing rappers.

The question must be asked: Why are all of them attracted to Obama?
Could it be they share similar values?
Do any of them see a president who might be malleable to their goals?

Real Kansas values here, right?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] of Obama’s first IL Senate run… where his legal team systematically eliminated all primary competitors by challenging all petition signatures… Obama has sent the lawyers in to attempt to quash the [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Jeannie, when you are a signature gatherer, you query the signer, and if they give the right answers… they sign, and you submit the list. However there can always be some weirdness with signatures if the signatories do not tell the truth. It’s not always the gatherer’s fault.

You still miss the point. The Obama campaign deliberately went on a hunt thru *every* competitor in order to potentially eliminate them, and thereby eliminate competition. Smart business and conservation of funds? Or course. Sleazy. Absolutely.

Was Obama under the same scrutiny? And are you suggesting that every competitor for Obama in his IL Senate election submitted such questionable petitions at a glance? Because, frankly, the odds are against that.

Doesn’t surprise me that your “friends” don’t complain about Obama. Your political leanings are obvious. However your voice is not in absolute unison with other Chicago denizens. And Obama demonstrated the “neopotism” you complained about… from his method of entry as a Senate nominee, to his handling of CAC funds.

Honest my butt…. it’s called politically ambitious. Period.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

my opponent in the run for sheriff in 1986, did checking of my petition, and you know, there wasn’t a single signature that was questionable. It never dawned on the people who helped me, or me for that matter to forge signatures. And it was pretty obvious on her pages, there were row after row of names that were printed, not signed and in the same ink and hand writing. It was her people that relied on Chicago Politics…you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours…..honesty never dawned on them.

I lived in Chicago for 30 years. Chicago politics is turning around and looking the other way…or bribery of police, or precinct captains for extra favorable things. It is nepotism to the Nth.

Obama was just honest. And I haven’t heard any of my friends complain about him back home

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Blinded by your adoration, I see, Jeannie.

Without having any reason upfront to suspect the petition signatures, the Obama campaign set out on a deliberate legal witch hunt. All they had to do was spend the time to pour over the papers, and find enough flaws. I suspect had they done the same to Obama’s they would have found flaws in his as well. In every petition gathering, there are some NFG. I know… I used to gather quite a few signatures.

However the entire action was designed to totally eliminate all others competing against him. They went after every competitor’s signatures… without probably cause. Just hoping they’d find enough of disqualify them. It’s easier to win the nomination when there’s no others running.

And *that* is Chicago politics. A systematic hit job on all who are in your way.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

the forms that the signatures are on have a sworn statement and are notarized!. It is illegal to forge a petition….Chicago politics would mean to leave the form alone and not contest it…duh.
State of Illinois )
) SS.
County of _____________________ )
I, ___________________________ do hereby certify that I reside at _____________________________, in the ________________________
(Circulator’s Name) (Street Address) (City/Village/Unincorporated Area)
of _____________________________________________, _______________, County of ____________________, State of ______________
(if unincorporated, list municipality that provides postal service) (Zip Code)
that I am 18 years of age or older, that I am a citizen of the United States, and that the signatures on this sheet were signed in my presence, not
more than 90 days preceding the last day for filing of the petitions and are genuine and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the persons
so signing were at the time of signing the petition registered voters of the political division in which the candidate is seeking elective office, and
that their respective residences are correctly stated, as above set forth.
_____________________________________
(Circulator’s Signature)
Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) by ___________________________ before me, on ________________.
(Name of Circulator) (insert month, day, year)
_____________________________________
(SEAL) (Notary Public’s Signature)
SHEET NO ________
SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME STREET ADDRESS OR
RR NUMBER
CITY, TOWN OR
VILLAGE
COUNTY
1. IL
2. IL
3. IL
4. IL
5. IL
6. IL
7. IL
8. IL
9. IL
10. IL
11. IL
12. IL
13. IL
14. IL
15. IL

Like or Dislike: 0  0

INSIDE SCHRODINGER’S VOTING BOOTH

AAAAAAAUUUUUUHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMM… . ……… …. ……. . . . …igatygggckklunlgk;ofhasohaof’kafka/…………….

(Idea inspired by “Capital L,” in an alternate blog-reality, who compared O’Bomber to a quantum particle, but didn’t take it far enough)

A normal quantum particle may end up taking any of a number of states, until it is “observed,” at which point certain aspects of those states become “known” or fixed in space and time, while all others become lost.

Obama, on the other hand, is alleged to be consistent (i.e., have fixed policies) when no one knows what those policies are, and he only appears to have multiple ones (i.e., to be inconsistent) when listeners try to pin him down to specifics. It’s the exact opposite, so he’s not like a normal quantum, he’s more like an “anti-quantum.”

In the case of the quantum particle, physicsts talk about an “observation” causing a particle to lose it’s invisible multiple virtual states and to take on a well defined position or trajectory by collapsing it’s “probability wave.”

In the case of Barack Hussein O’Bummer, on the other hand, we see that he abandons his invisible allegedly “well defined” position or direction when forced to be specific. This is due to an act of “observation” (demanding the details) which causes a collapse of some sort of anti-probability wave, which I propose we call his “happy wave,” (since it causes him such consternation when it is lost).

This is a useful concept, because we can now see that what he calls “racism” is any act of interference with his “specific” (but utterly unknowable) thought processes that causes the collapse of that “happy wave,” forcing him to appear to not have a clue what he is talking about (though he did before being asked, at which point only we hadn’t a clue, but that didn’t matter as long as we kept quiet about it).

So, you see, it is our fault he appears incoherrent. If only we didn’t bother him for specifics, we could all just ride his happy-wave with him to a lollypop future of hope and change and a Schroedinger Kitten in evey pot, and LucyInDisquiseWithZircons for ever more. But if you racists dare to bum him out, and collapse his happy-wave by asking him for specifics, then the whole beautiful hallucination will dissappear, and it will be all your fault if we have to go back to reality, ….before the koolaid has ……… had …….. …. … time ….. … ……. …. … . .. . .. . to ……………………………………………………………

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“This enthusiasm is about something bigger than any one candidate. It’s about our shared desire to change the way Washington does business. We are ready to move beyond the failed policies of George W. Bush and come together around common values that will lead us to a better future for all Americans. Through Unite for Change house meetings, friends and neighbors of various backgrounds will come together to organize and grow our grassroots movement for change.”

Ah yes, as AS fully admits, he’s just another politician:

Obama is a politician. And he competes to win

So much for “change” in Washington.

Then again, there is a difference. In the wake of his promises of changing the way Washington does business, this makes him a moral amoeba, campaigning on an outright lie. Rather like the entire DNC did in 2006, promising to end the war in Iraq immediately.

As I said, Obama’s moral “high road” is totally blocked by a landslide of a’moral debris.

Like or Dislike: 0  0