the pictures look pretty real to me, they could be photo shop but who knows. the rich and powerful libs always think they can get away with this stuff, like the world should look the other way for them.
i really don’t care if the baby is his or not, but at least be honest about it, don’t deny the kid is yours if its not. that makes him look worse than if he came out and said he slipped and was unfaithful. why can’t politicians be honest? i respect honesty far more than smoke being blown up my ass.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] a short time away, the MSM may be forced into covering the John Edwards love child scandal and as Flopping Aces says, “forced to report the [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’m talking about the playing around that’s going on. I’m talking about the young girls. I’m talking about the cookies. I’m talking about keeping our pants zipped and our wicks dry around here! — John Glenn (D-OH)

Maybe John Edwards should have seen the “Right Stuff”

Like or Dislike: 0  0

You mean the MSM is biased How can that be????

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Tight message control is not new and he could always give his message outside using a megaphone to the protestors and those line up for the McCain fried food lunch trucks.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

The National Enquirer may be super market tabloid but if they have pictures (I saw some today, fake or not???) then Edwards is toast. Best thing for him to do is blame it on his wife’s cancer (she’s too ill to travel) and cancel any appearance in Denver. He has a way with words that will make democrats pity him.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

MSM To Be Forced To Report The News?

For one brief moment there, I thought you were posting on the Unfairness Doctrine.

Like or Dislike: 0  0