[...] They must of grown secular recently eh? [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Thanks, MH. I was a little late at reading your comment to me.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

There you go, twisting my comment again. First of all, the reason I wrote what you quoted me on is because you’re good for nothing except for causing a big headache. That’s NOT what I said OR implied.

Secondly, true, I don’t like Obama. What pisses me off, besides explaining EVERYTHING to you, is that everything I’m surrounded by seems to be obsessed with candidate Hussein. And it is unfair what the MSM and everything involved with the media is doing. And yes, I won’t vote for Hussein, and yes, it is disgusting how he manages to fool everyone with his lies.

Now that we’ve gone off-topic again, it’s time to close the debate.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Leah, Leah… you so quickly forgot the heads up I gave you??

No matter. Perhaps a visual will help you keep your frustration under control…

Like or Dislike: 0  0

What’s the point? I’d disprove you again, but you’ll only come back at me with another misunderstanding and another instance of your missing the point.

I understand perfectly. You don’t like Obama, so if you see and Obama ad without a McCain ad to balance it or something, then it’s unfair. You won’t vote for Obama, so the idea that a lot of people will is disgusting.

Par for the course for the Right.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

*sigh* What’s the point? I’d disprove you again, but you’ll only come back at me with another misunderstanding and another instance of your missing the point. Think what you want, interpret my comment the way you want. Like I wrote before, it’s tiring to have to explain things to you. It’s no use educating you.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I meant the obsession. The lack of fairness or balance in displaying party candidates. I guess I was wrong in expecting you to figure that out on your own, but then again, this isn’t the first time you’ve misread my comment.

I’m not bashing on the people who choose to display their candidate, I’m addressing THE ADS. You know, those annoying ads that pop up everywhere?

I’d say that the thing that threw me off is that you’re talking about “fairness” and “balance,” which is kind of a stupid way to look at advertising.

Let me suggest another paradigm for you that doesn’t involving whining: “buying ads on Facebook” and “not buying ads on Facebook.”

Obama and his supporters, it would seem, are buying ads on Facebook. McCain and his supporters, it would seem, are not. Do you want McCain ads on Facebook? Then either buy some ads or convince McCain to buy some ads. Stop sniveling about “fairness.”

Perhaps you’re suggesting that McCain is, in fact, buying ads, but that Facebook is unfairly suppressing them? Then say so.

Either way, “disgusting” is an absurd description. It’s disgusting that Obama supporters want him to win and are buying advertising to help make that happen? McCain ads, then, must also be disgusting. I don’t think that that word means what you think it means.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“Your idea that people need to apply the fairness doctrine to their personal Facebook pages–which would be akin to expecting people to apply the fairness doctrine to their choice of bumper stickers–is of surpassing idiocy.”

Your ability to understand the simplest of comments is of surpassing idiocy. If your logic made any sense at all, you’d understand my comments and not twist them into something else. I’m not bashing on the people who choose to display their candidate, I’m addressing THE ADS. You know, those annoying ads that pop up everywhere? Yeah, THOSE. Not the pages of candidates that a Facebook user chooses to display. If you go back and read my original comment, you can see I explicitly wrote “ads”, not the users’ choice. Those are two different things.

And yes, there are ads that say something along the lines of “Loving Obama?”

This is another strike against you in misreading comments, I hope you know. And I’ve also noticed it’s not only my comments you choose to misread. You have been the only one on this site who cannot seem to grasp the meaning of my comments, sarcastic or otherwise, so my comments aren’t the problem, it’s you. It’s rather tiring to have to S.P.E.L.L__E.V.E.R.Y.T.H.I.N.G__O.U.T for you.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I meant the obsession. The lack of fairness or balance in displaying party candidates.

I took several stabs at writing a comment about this, but I couldn’t wrap my mind around The Stupid. Your idea that people need to apply the fairness doctrine to their personal Facebook pages–which would be akin to expecting people to apply the fairness doctrine to their choice of bumper stickers–is of surpassing idiocy.

Be disgusted that people prefer Obama, if you must, but you only show yourself as a fool if you expect people who prefer Obama to tout McCain as well. Or to buy a cereal they don’t like, or wear clothes they don’t want to wear–all in the name of fairness.

Can I assume from your post that you’ll be displaying both Obama and McCain signs in your yard this fall? It would, after all, be fair.

I was wrong in expecting you to figure that out on your own, but then again, this isn’t the first time you’ve misread my comment.

In the future, it would help immensely if your comments made any kind of sense at all. Reading is the act of bringing meaning to print, and the task is made infinitely more difficult when the print itself has no meaning.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I meant the obsession. The lack of fairness or balance in displaying party candidates. I guess I was wrong in expecting you to figure that out on your own, but then again, this isn’t the first time you’ve misread my comment.

Like or Dislike: 0  0