22 Jul

McCain: “Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign”

[DELETED BY AUTHOR]

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, John McCain, The Iraqi War. Bookmark the permalink. Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 1:13 pm
| 3 views

41 Responses to McCain: “Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign”

  1. SpideyTerry says: 1

    Does the phrase “It’s on now” mean anything to anyone?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Arthurstone says: 2

    ‘It seems to me’ that we have just over 3 months of Republican smears to endure before the election.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Pingback: McCain: “Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign” at osmoothie

  4. Leah says: 3

    You mean alongside the Democratic flip-flops and inconsistencies?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Pingback: McCain: Obama Rather Win The Election Than Win The War : BigMouthFrog

  6. Leah: In “Arthur’s” world any criticism of a Democrat is considered a smear.

    In his world it’s only natural to show nothing but adoration and obedience to the messiah.

    Sieg Heil Artie!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. yonason says: 5

    FILTH & SMEARS GALORE

    O’BUMMER IS A SCHEISS MAGNET, SO IF SOMEONE SUPPORTS HIM, YOU CAN PRETTY SURE YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ARE “MADE OF”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Scrapiron says: 6

    Hussein O can flip flop, retreat. lie and say he didn’t say that, but he can’t change his position on the war. His life and the lives of his family are invested in doing whatever is necessary to lose. The Moonbat’s will kill him and his family as sure as he drives the knife deeper into their backs than he has already. I understand there is one man among the unbreathing that they considered a threat to Hussein.

    I’m still confused on why he would release a phony (confirmed forgery) birth record. Was he even born in Hawaii? Hussein’s past record, or lack of records, stinks to high heaven. Could he have moved to an Islamic country in his mother’s stomach and not at a young age? No conspiricy, just a lot of unanswered question on the blogs that Hussein could clear up with a few honest answers, truth seems beyond his ability.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. yonason says: 7

    Scrapiron

    And Kerry has never released his complete mil record, either. Worms of a feather, and all that… It does make me want to see his real birth cirt., I mean if it’s illegal to be pres., without being a citizen, then I would think we have a right to take this to court, if need be. Maybe someone can organize a class action suit to demand it? That would be “sweet,” especially if it’s got info that would invalidate his candidacy.

    Oh, oh! I had a terrible thought. What if Obama, who we all know is a useless nothing, isn’t the guy they want, but his VEEP will be? They wouldn’t even have to kill Obie, just produce his COLB after the election, and the VEEP would automatically be pres. (anyone use that idea for a thriller novel and I’ll let you know where to send the check for the idea).

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. stix1972 says: 8

    Just remember anything true about a Democrat is a smear. Just look at what they did the Swift Boat for Truth members.

    Another comment jacking.

    Go to Strata-sphere for information on the Birth Certificate. It is not a fake.
    http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5690

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Arthurstone says: 9

    You kids are funny.

    I make a little remark about three months of Republican smears and you fall all over yourselves proving me correct.

    From Mike: “Sieg Heil’

    From Scrapiron: John Kerry’s incomplete military records, Obama’s phony birth certificate and t he likelihood of his moving to a Muslim country in his mother stomach (sic.) Earth to Scrapiron: Babies don’t live in their Mother’s stomach! And that isn’t another Liberal lie. You can check.

    stix1972: The ‘abuse’ of the Swift Boat for Truth’ members.

    Well done folks!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. stix1972 says: 10

    What abuse. Has anyone every proved them wrong??? And did Kerry ever release his Records. He said he would a few years ago.

    And I think the whole Birth Certificate thing is ridiculous. It is not like “Rathergate”.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. AS usual Artie is distorting and bobbing and weaving.

    I hope you don’t drive in that condition Artie.

    Perhaps if you want to see what a real smear looks like you can examine the Obama web site, the link to which Yonason provided in comment #5 above:

    The following is from the official Barack Hussein Obama web site:

    The kike filth are trying to steal this election from us. But this is our time. The kike live in fear of peace. They fear happiness. The thought of people living happily in peace without killing each other frightens the horde of kike that runs our government. But when pieces of kike use their kike manipulation tactics to stop Barack, it is time to strike back. There is nothing a kike army can do when faced with progressive people who are determined to achieve peace. We will achieve lasting peace.

    Notice the difference Artie?

    Now that Artie has been educated, we will return this thread to the topic of the post.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Fit fit says: 12

    My Friends,

    McCain would rather let American troops die than lose this campaign.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. yonason says: 13

    Precisely, Mike’s America!

    Stoner has no objection when one of his fellow floaters makes a much bigger and more toxic stink than anything we are capable of, though are falsely accused of by them all the time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. yonason says: 14

    “Go to Strata-sphere for information on the Birth Certificate. It is not a fake.” — stix1972

    He didn’t say it wasn’t a fake, and if he did, he shouldn’t have.

    He said only that one can’t tell EITHER WAY from an internet copy, which means that unless Obie produces the real thing, presents it to the proper witnesses and has them validate it, it might as well be fake. As the copy itself says, “any alterations invalidate this cirtificate” and an un-notarized copy is a form of “alteration.” So, yes, it is a fraud.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. DW 5000 says: 15

    The following is from the official Barack Hussein Obama web site:

    The kike filth are trying to steal this election from us. But this is our time. The kike live in fear of peace. They fear happiness. The thought of people living happily in peace without killing each other frightens the horde of kike that runs our government. But when pieces of kike use their kike manipulation tactics to stop Barack, it is time to strike back. There is nothing a kike army can do when faced with progressive people who are determined to achieve peace. We will achieve lasting peace.

    Hmm. Possibly. It’s hard to tell, though, because your link goes to Atlas Shrugs, while her link goes to Doug Ross’s blog, which in turn links to Little Green Footballs, which doesn’t turn that page up anywhere. That’s what you call a “wingnut circle jerk.” Your poutrage feeds off someone else’s which fed off someone else’s which started–where?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. DW 5000 says: 16

    Could he have moved to an Islamic country in his mother’s stomach and not at a young age?

    ???!!!???

    I hail thee, Scrapiron, oh, King of the Nuts!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. yonason says: 17

    WD40

    “Your poutrage feeds off someone else’s which fed off someone else’s which started–where?”

    The reason, as I’m sure you know, is that when people get offended, and it attracts attention, then they erase the evidence, which is why the screen shots were taken OF OBAMA’S WEB SITE (which is the “where” it started) rather than relying on the link being there.

    And that is just one of many examples of the scum Obama attracts. Some of those in the Black community see the objectionable characters who gravitate to Obama, and are sounding the alarm about it.

    If only there were more.

    Note that if WD were honest, he/she/it would look for more examples. Using a know propaganda technique to “expose” a legitimate counter espionage one shows WD for what he/she/it is, “one of them” (or a useful idiot, which in effect is the same thing).

    http://husaria.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/obama-campaign-sanctioned-anti-semitic-and-other-hate-speech/
    http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/hate-mongers-for-obama-or-obamas-anti.html
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/06/08/will-media-report-anti-semitic-article-obamas-website
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2028539/posts
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1987939/posts
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/obamas_website_hub_for_hate_terror_and_antisemitism/index.html
    etc., etc.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. Oh yeah Dim Wit… all those folks who posted the link to the Obama page with the “kike” rant were lying….

    Just another example of how you folks exempt yourselves from the standards you daily demand of us.

    Now, if you don’t mind, I am going to repeat the last line of the post:

    McCain: “I had the courage and political judgement to say that I would rather lose a political campaign than lose a war. It seems to me Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.”

    You can push your conspiracy theories about right wingers faking Obama web pages some other time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. DW 5000 says: 19

    The reason, as I’m sure you know, is that when people get offended, and it attracts attention, then they erase the evidence, which is why the screen shots were taken OF OBAMA’S WEB SITE (which is the “where” it started) rather than relying on the link being there.

    This looks like a screenshot from the Obama site, as well. IT MUST BE TRUE, THEN!!! I can’t believe that Obama had the guts to post those quotes. He’s a brave man.

    Note to Mike: by your own petard shall ye be hoist.

    Note that if WD were honest, he/she/it would look for more examples.

    Following three or four consecutive links seemed like enough to establish the jerking of the circle. It’s not my fault if you can’t link to anything other than links to other links to further links. I’m not interested in doing your job for you.

    Using a know propaganda technique to “expose” a legitimate counter espionage one shows WD for what he/she/it is, “one of them”

    …And that just reads like one of those badly-translated instruction manuals for putting together a stereo. Dude: that’s not even English. You get to edit your posts. Give it a try.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. yonason says: 20

    OH DIM OF WIT

    Obama didn’t post those. His sick supporters did. He is a magnate for garbage and hate. And I gave you other references.

    Also, consider his other supporters…

    Paleostinian terrorists
    http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/barack-obamas-gaza-campaign-office/
    Hamas
    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020315.php
    Libya
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7378960543702619484
    socialists
    http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/somethings-not-quite-right-about-that.html
    crooks
    http://www.bestsyndication.com/?q=20080404_barack_obama.htm
    http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/29/ayers-obama-philanthropy-corruption-what-big-media-refuses-to-disclose-about-obamas-checkered-past-in-chicago-machine-politics/
    thugs
    http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com/2008/06/barack-obama-condones-coordinated.html
    domestic terrorists
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/04/ayres_and_obamaits_not_the_cri.html
    Racists
    http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/04/barack_hussein_3.html
    Black Supremists and other racists
    http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html
    etc., etc.

    And he’s a liar.
    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/07/unbelievable-obama-denies-he-flip.html

    If all we had were that one web site, you might have a case, but because all his friends are VERY VERY BAD PEOPLE, you’re objection is the objection of a fool or al liar.

    Now, will sombody please hit that droid’s reset button!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. yonason says: 21

    You['ve] get to edit your posts. Give it a try

    GOT ME THERE, BUT…

    …you have to edit your conscience, if you have one. (see my previous post when they dig it out of spam-block).

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Again, Dim Wit’s effort is yet another transparent effort to hijack this post and distract us all from one simple message:

    McCain: “I had the courage and political judgement to say that I would rather lose a political campaign than lose a war. It seems to me Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. yonason says: 23

    LOLOLOL

    Thanks! Good one!

    P.S. can you dig my last one out of spam-block? It ws to this thread. Thx, and g’night.

    I LIKED IT BETTER THE OTHER WAY!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. yonason says: 24

    O’Bomber’s supporters are apparently all idiots (or malicious)
    http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/04/25/the-total-witlessness-of-obama-apologists/

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. “all idiots (or malicious)”

    Or?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  28. yonason says: 26

    lol
    both, of course

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  29. Wordsmith says: 27

    Mike shouted:

    McCain: “I had the courage and political judgement to say that I would rather lose a political campaign than lose a war. It seems to me Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.”

    Can you post that any louder, Mike?

    People should keep in mind how pessimistic public opinion was, at the time President Bush announced the new strategy and troop surge, and how McCain did stake his political neck out on it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  30. stix1972 says: 28

    You can make a billboard out of it and the trolls will still spout out nonsense.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  31. Wordsmith: I think Stix’s answer pretty much says it.

    You will have noticed that every time we get a very clear and irrefutable distinction between McCain and Obama the neocommies show up wiuth their noise machine.

    They’re like children who don’t want to hear something and stick their fingers in their ears and shout “lalalalalalalalala” to keep from hearing anything that might upset their apple cart.

    They’ve built Obama’s candidacy like a house of cards. Or I as like to say, a house of canards.

    And they can’t afford to let the wind of truth blow too close to that fragile construction of lies, false hopes and demagougery.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  32. Arthurstone says: 30

    Mike-

    How much courage does it take to *say* I would rather lose a political campaign than a war?

    Talk about meaningless rhetoric.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  33. stix1972 says: 31

    Athurstone do you have a clue???? Obama is saying anything ande verything to everone to get elected and McCain is taking a stand on principle.

    We do not elect people to do exactly waht we sayand tell them to do. That is mob rule, we have a Democratic Republic, in which we vote people to vote their conscience, not for us to tell them exactly what to do. And if that means losing an election as McCain has said, that is how the country should work. More power to him. I can not stand politicians changing their views every other day as Obama has.

    We need more history lessons here again.

    Come by when you actually get out of Obama crotch long enough to actually say something intelligent.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  34. McCain didn’t give a speech “Arthur.”

    McCain is standing on a record of ACTION.

    Compare that to the empty suit you worship blindly.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  35. Wordsmith says: 33

    Arthur,

    Do you recall the time period when McCain had made that statement? After Bush’s SotU 2007 speech about the new change in strategy, only 38% of Americans approved of it according to Gallup; and for the first time, a plurality of Americans- 47-49%, believed that the U.S. was likely to lose the war. With the war being unpopular, political cowards who blow with the wind, could easily cast their lot in with the mood of the public. McCain didn’t do that. He staked his presidential-aspirant neck out, because he put the importance of America winning a war as being far more important than his presidential aspiration.

    That takes character, Arthur. It doesn’t mean you have to vote for him, or agree with his politics. But it should command some goddamn respect out of your partisan peabrain.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  36. Arthurstone says: 34

    Mike, defying reality, typed:

    McCain didn’t give a speech “Arthur.”

    I hate to break it to you Mike but McCain did indeed give a speech and you provided an actual quote of the speech where he *said* what he said.

    But hey it’s your thread and if I’ve learned anything about you it’s to that you will ignore your own words as they become, as one of your heroes would say, ‘inoperative’.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  37. Arthurstone says: 35

    wordsmith re: John McCain typed:

    That takes character, Arthur. It doesn’t mean you have to vote for him, or agree with his politics. But it should command some goddamn respect out of your partisan peabrain.

    Respect? For the tag line where he suggests his political opponent is a traitor?

    I am giving the man exactly the respect he deserves.

    I particularly enjoy the ‘victory’ and ‘honor’ part.

    I also enjoy the blurring and exaggeration of just what the ‘surge’ has accomplished.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  38. “Arthur” You’re just playing your silly little game again in an attempt to refocus attention away from McCain’s words.

    Yes, he uttered the WORDS in a speech, but his RECORD is one of ACTIONS.

    Again, I realize in the fantasy world of la la liberalism that you inhabit the distinction between a man’s record and a man’s speeches are lost.

    In McCain, his words match his actions and his record.

    And since Wordsmith asked if I could shout this any louder I am going to give it a try. Perhaps you ought to read the words and reflect on McCain’s record before trotting your ignorance out for all to see again Artie!

    McCain: “I had the courage

    and political judgement to say

    that I would rather lose a

    political campaign than

    lose a war.

    It seems to me Senator

    Obama would rather

    lose a war in order to

    win a political campaign.”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  39. Arthurstone says: 37

    What size is that font Mike?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  40. yonason says: 38

    Stoner is just one of those smarmy arrogant narcissists who prefer to mock others rather than contribute anything. And why would he try to contribute, anyway, when, with his limited abilities, he would only embarrass himself? I mean, just go back and look at his ignorant comments on who lead Civil Rights, or how we are exaggerating the bigotry and hate of Obama’s supporters. Did he step in it then, or what?! Yes, it’s safer for him to just make irrelevant snide remarks from an intellectual distance that stroke his overblown ego without revealing the profound depth of his ignorance and malice.

    But, guess what, stoner, you haven’t gotten what you stepped in off your paws. We can still smell ya.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  41. Yonason: You brilliantly captured the essence of “Arthur” and most of the leftwing nattering nabobs of negativism that lurk here.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>