Comments on: UPDATED: Scientists Re-Open Climate Change Debate Citing, “Considerable Presence of Skeptics” http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics Fri, 25 May 2012 21:11:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: SnarlyJohn http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-205058 SnarlyJohn Mon, 25 May 2009 22:34:02 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-205058 First time posting here<a href="http://trutestinternational.com" rel="nofollow">.</a> Can anyone tell me their opinion of the forum thus far<a href="http://holyhiphoponline.com" rel="nofollow">.</a> Leave me a post and introduce yourself<a href="http://www.theundergroundsite.com" rel="nofollow">.</a> See ya<a href="http://www.militaryhookups.com" rel="nofollow">,</a> <a href="http://www.getanewsjob.com" rel="nofollow">.</a>

First time posting here.
Can anyone tell me their opinion of the forum thus far.
Leave me a post and introduce yourself.

See ya, .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-188653 yonason Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:27:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-188653 c3m3t3ry-at-gmail.com Company: Google, Inc. Location: Mountain View, CA IP Address: 209.85.147.18 http://whois.domaintools.com/209.85.147.18

c3m3t3ry-at-gmail.com
Company: Google, Inc.
Location: Mountain View, CA
IP Address: 209.85.147.18
http://whois.domaintools.com/209.85.147.18

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-188648 yonason Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:23:59 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-188648 @<a href="#comment-188645" rel="nofollow">Huilo</a>: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=c3m3t3ry&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7ADBR_en" rel="nofollow"><strong>आप एक व्यस्त बंदर क्या हैं पीएस,!</strong></a> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBR_en&q=c3m3t3ry+HUILO" rel="nofollow">Teď, aby se zúžil hledání pro naše malé zombie ...</a> Oh, and one more thing, hoolahoop... <a href="http://javanivey.com/images/shirts/ji_screw_ball.jpg" rel="nofollow">तुम एक पेंच गेंद रहे हैं.</a>

@Huilo:

आप एक व्यस्त बंदर क्या हैं पीएस,!

Teď, aby se zúžil hledání pro naše malé zombie …

Oh, and one more thing, hoolahoop…
तुम एक पेंच गेंद रहे हैं.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-188647 yonason Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:17:26 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-188647 @<a href="#comment-188645" rel="nofollow">Huilo</a>: says... <em>"If you want to know how I broke your site, send $ 20 WMZ: Z385450145510 and e-mail c3m3t3ry@gmail.com Thanks."</em> to which I respond... <em>"Kung nais mong malaman kung paano ko isinalin na ang iyong mensahe, magpadala ng $ 40 para sa aking mga kaibigan sa Flopping Aces: Thanks."</em> BTW, what do you mean "broke your site?" ...getting by the spam filter using a foreign language?

@Huilo:

says… “If you want to know how I broke your site, send $ 20 WMZ: Z385450145510 and e-mail c3m3t3ry@gmail.com Thanks.”

to which I respond…

“Kung nais mong malaman kung paano ko isinalin na ang iyong mensahe, magpadala ng $ 40 para sa aking mga kaibigan sa Flopping Aces: Thanks.”

BTW, what do you mean “broke your site?” …getting by the spam filter using a foreign language?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-174217 yonason Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:15:01 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-174217 REGARDING MY POST, ABOVE.... @<a href="#comment-99093" rel="nofollow">yonason</a>: It seems I messed up the link, but not to worry, here's another with lots more scientists. http://www.climatesceptics.com.au/sceptic-scientists.html I know that won't be enough to satisfy John Ryan, a genius in his own mind, but all you people out there who actually have a brain might be interesed. ALSO... <BLOCKQUOTE>Point 1.1: Global Warming has halted Global mean temperature rose continuously from 1800-1850. The rate of increase was .05 degrees Celsius per 100 years. This was mostly unrelated to CO2 gas (CO2 began to increase suddenly after 1946. Until the sudden increase, the CO2 emissions rate had been almost unchanged for 100 years). However, since 2001, this increase halted. Despite this, CO2 emissions are still increasing. According to the IPCC panel, global atmospheric temperatures should continue to rise, so it is very likely that the hypothesis that the majority of global warming can be ascribed to the Greenhouse Effect is mistaken. There is no prediction of this halt in global warming in IPCC simulations. The halt of the increase in temperature, and slight downward trend is "something greater than the Greenhouse Effect," but it is in effect. What that "something" is, is natural variability. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/25/jstor_climate_report_translation/print.html </BLOCKQUOTE> NASA's propagandists call it a "speed bumb" and believe with perfect faith that AGW will take off again, ....as soon as their fantasy world becomes real.

REGARDING MY POST, ABOVE…. @yonason:

It seems I messed up the link, but not to worry, here’s another with lots more scientists.
http://www.climatesceptics.com.au/sceptic-scientists.html

I know that won’t be enough to satisfy John Ryan, a genius in his own mind, but all you people out there who actually have a brain might be interesed.

ALSO…

Point 1.1: Global Warming has halted
Global mean temperature rose continuously from 1800-1850. The rate of increase was .05 degrees Celsius per 100 years. This was mostly unrelated to CO2 gas (CO2 began to increase suddenly after 1946. Until the sudden increase, the CO2 emissions rate had been almost unchanged for 100 years). However, since 2001, this increase halted. Despite this, CO2 emissions are still increasing.

According to the IPCC panel, global atmospheric temperatures should continue to rise, so it is very likely that the hypothesis that the majority of global warming can be ascribed to the Greenhouse Effect is mistaken. There is no prediction of this halt in global warming in IPCC simulations. The halt of the increase in temperature, and slight downward trend is “something greater than the Greenhouse Effect,” but it is in effect. What that “something” is, is natural variability.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/25/jstor_climate_report_translation/print.html

NASA’s propagandists call it a “speed bumb” and believe with perfect faith that AGW will take off again, ….as soon as their fantasy world becomes real.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: MataHarley http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-159246 MataHarley Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:24:28 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-159246 Shalom, syncAners! I add my welcome to Scott's.

Shalom, syncAners! I add my welcome to Scott’s.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Scott Malensek http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-159245 Scott Malensek Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:19:31 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-159245 Welcome Aners!

Welcome Aners!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-99699 yonason Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:11:00 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-99699 IT WAS EERILY QUIET, ...ALL TOO QUIET Here's one I'll be posting again... <a href="http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/pickoftheweek/hi_lo.jpg" rel="nofollow">The Sun, then and now</a> Solar activity is down, and the earth has begun to cool. And it's probably going to remain that way for a decade or two. D'OH! My plans on moving north are currently on hold. follow space weather here http://www.spaceweather.com/ and here http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/images/

IT WAS EERILY QUIET, …ALL TOO QUIET

Here’s one I’ll be posting again…

The Sun, then and now

Solar activity is down, and the earth has begun to cool. And it’s probably going to remain that way for a decade or two. D’OH!

My plans on moving north are currently on hold.

follow space weather here
http://www.spaceweather.com/

and here
http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/images/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Mike's America http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-99518 Mike's America Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:45:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-99518 Viscount Monkton is one smart cookie. I glanced at that paper and I'd hate to have to debate HIM on the facts. No wonder Gore refuses.

Viscount Monkton is one smart cookie. I glanced at that paper and I’d hate to have to debate HIM on the facts.

No wonder Gore refuses.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: yonason http://floppingaces.net/2008/07/18/scientists-reverse-position-on-climate-change-citing-considerable-presence-of-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-99512 yonason Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:37:22 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5911#comment-99512 <b>"I pointed out they added the red disclaimer after the fact."</b> -- M.H. Yep. That's why I picked up on it; because you had earlier pointed that out. Otherwise I might not have made the connection.

“I pointed out they added the red disclaimer after the fact.” — M.H.

Yep. That’s why I picked up on it; because you had earlier pointed that out. Otherwise I might not have made the connection.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>