[...] FACT: Barack Obama supports local gun bans in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other cities. (Curt-But once ban was overturned he flip-flopped) [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] FACT: Barack Obama supports local gun bans in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other cities. (Curt-But once ban was overturned he flip-flopped) [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] FACT: Barack Obama supports local gun bans in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other cities. (Curt-But once ban was overturned he flip-flopped) [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] The Obama Flip-Flop Continues On Gun Bans.  Flopping Aces.  June 26, 2008. [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

This just appeared on Amazon.com

I like it – it is so true.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] are the stickers to represent “Gunowners for Obama“? They have “Republicans for Obama”, so I can’t understand, for the life of [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] his position (commonly-called a “flip-flop” or more honestly, a pandering deception) gun control, NAFTA, the FISA bill, financing his campaign, marijuana, the Cuba embargo, and meeting with Mad [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] latest flip-flops from Obama after he flipped over FISA, guns, and public financing, is his new stance on gay marriage. He once supported the rights of the [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Boy, I guess Mata work up on the wrong side of the bed.

I guess you didn’t see the video where McCain stated that he was for an assault weapons ban but know that he is sitting in front of Outdoorsmen magazine he not for it so much any more. He makes these statements all in the same clip.

Lighten up, I know that you were a bit bruised yesterday. But I want peace.

Salute to you all.

And,

Just For The Record

I have never been to a BHO rally. I saw it on TV. Maybe that still makes me hypnotized.

I am an independent and drink kool-aide from both cups, but I have a fool proof detox plan called research and a healthy skepticism for anyone willing (stupid) enough to run for President.

I wanted Huck and like Buchanan for trade and immigration. And would probably vote for McCain, but his immigration views very similar to BHOs.

More than kool-aide, I just often need a stiff drink.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Here is a more nuanced position by Senator McCain on guns (He believes in an individual right, but he also believes in background checks and other common good measures to limit second amendment rights.He claims the NRA agrees with him, but they do not support background checks at gun shows for example.

Wades ass deep into unknown waters, this one. Now we’re getting lectures from him about the NRA, based on his media education.

There is already background checks at gun shows and has been for years. The latest Lautenberg assault on Constitutional rights is not a “gun show loophole” as advertised to the gullible. It’s a data collection scheme on every attendee to gun shows (broadly and vaguely defined), plus the ability for the FBI to keep background checks that pass for 90 days… i.e. an invasion of privacy.

But the JFTRs of the world walk around in a cerebral fog – willing to give away rights they don’t care about as “reasonable” until it’s a right they *do* care about. You see, it’s okay for Constitutional rights to stop at “sensitive places” to him for the RKBA, and it’s up to him and the masses to decide what is a “sensitive place”.

And what if the masses decided that a BHO rally was a “sensitive place” – a possible gathering of people including Hamas, the New Black Panther Party, Socialist and Communist party members, and Bill Ayer’s upcoming domestic terrorist proteges. Using the S 2577 concept, JFTR and buds need to sign a ledger upon entry with their personal information. That ledger must be retained by the rally promotor forever, and offered up for federal inspection upon every demand. All because some of these citizens *may* be up to no good.

But, ya know, it was a “sensitive place”, and we supposedly accept that Constitutional rights stop where a “sensitive place” starts.

I suspect the JFTR’s of the world would be screaming “foul” and “facist” at the top of their lungs. And they’d be absolutely right… But they would never equate what they believe is an obvious injustice to BHO rally attendees to their own demands for gun owners. Such is an example of perspective by narcissists… never understanding that when the RKBA becomes so diluted as to be non-existent, the rest of our Constitutional rights will do the same.

Check your free speech at the door, please. This is a “sensitive place”, and only unity is allowed.

Like or Dislike: 0  0