[...] Senators Remove Their Own Statements from Report on Pre-War Iraq Intelligence [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

NEWPUPPYDIXIE

I do not believe that is a Chicago political machine or Vermont elitist accent. But keep trying.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’m afraid it’s the “he who” part everyone has wrong. Given the characters involved, it should be “he haw!” See if that doesn’t make everything fit just a little better.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Iraq Intelligence Report, and they were found twisting, shoddy, deceptive intelligence information. Flopping Aces

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I thought it was he who controls the spice, controls…

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.” — George Orwell

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Flopping Aces – Senators Remove Their Own Statements From Report on Pre-War Iraq Intelligence [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

So then the “Libertarian Dem”, by pure definition a contradiction, could also be coined “Neoleft” in a “newspeak” sort of way as “Neocon” was. Well, Stormfront and Black Bloq do march with the “anti-war” protesters and the WWP, so it could happen… Politics and power do make strange bedfellows. It could also be as you indicated, something entirely new and looking at the article on Wiki, I have to wonder how historical figures they mentioned fit into modern parties. I have to wonder if this party is a morph of the “Libertarian-Green” movement or others.

There is a growing rift in the Democrat Party as seen by the Hillary supporter’s clash with Obama’s supporters. It may cause the Democrat Party to move even farther left (Obama wins) or more centrist-left (Hillary wins). The Republican Party’s move left alienated its base and conservatives, yet the RNC could care it seems. I wonder how the DNC will reguard its Move-on/ANSWER/ACT/ACORN/WWP/ACP base? Looking at Howard Deans actions, I would say the DNC either will string their base along and expect them to vote out of “2 Minutes Hate” inspired BDS or loyalty while Democrat leaders do exactly what the 2006 Dem Congress did: nothing; OR they really will push for a hard socialism (INSOC or Lenin style) implementation on the US populance.

I do agree about the “destroy the language” aspect, which is why “political correctness” appauled me when I witnessed its formation. Outlaw words and one outlaws concepts. Outlaw concepts and one outlaws thoughts. Change words and concepts and the old concepts/root meaning of the words and ideas dissapear. What was accepted in the 1990s as truth becomes forgotten when a “conservative” (in quotes as President Bush and the current RNC are more moderate, not conservatives) takes charge. Ideas of personal rights AND responsibilites change, or go away.

I fully expect that an Obama administration, backed by the media, and with or without a supermajority in Congress, flip history again. The last 8 years would be nothing but failure, but the week after the innaguration, and all news would be positive. Flowers would bloom, terrorists would stop attacking us, the socialists in Europe would love the USA, only good news would be allowed out of Iraq and any bad news would now have a positive spin, false reports by the media (like fake IEDs, fake ‘civilians’ supposedly killed by Coalition forces, etc) would go away unless they served as a “snowball” target.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

#6 didn’t make any sense, either…

Reading
Is
Fundamental

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’m seeing the texting as death of language therefore ability to reason which was goal of Ingsoc
Destroy the language and you have no words to…reason with? I’m thinking given what Libertarian Dem looks like in wikipedia is totalitarian or fascism? This would be the New Left? I have no idea who they are? They aren’t Democrats as I know them or ever have known them. The split in the party of late is evidence of that deep rift to me. Dem values are like McCain maybe. It is only young dems going for that marketing schema — they are face/book gen.

Like or Dislike: 0  0