…..and they wonder why it is We the People think them lower than snakeshit.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] support our enemies while thumbing his nose at the entire world for the previous 13 years. As the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Phase II investigation report on pre-war Iraq Intelligence s…: Conclusion 10: Statements in the major speeches analyzed, as well additional statements, [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] with the 2006 Senate Intelligence Investigation into pre-war intel, and its 2008 phase II final report, this report, TORA BORA REVISITED: HOW WE FAILED TO GET BIN LADEN AND WHY IT MATTERS TODAY smacks [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Scott wrote up the definitive key points of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Phase II investigation report on pre-war Iraq Intel [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] KEY Points Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Phase II investigation report on pre-war Iraq Int… [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] KEY POINTS Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Phase II investigation report on pre-war Iraq Int… [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

LA Times editorial on June 16th, by James Kirchick – http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-kirchick16-2008jun16,0,7766785.story

From the editorial: “In 2004, the Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously approved a report acknowledging that it “did not find any evidence that administration officials attempted to coerce, influence or pressure analysts to change their judgments.” The following year, the bipartisan Robb-Silberman report similarly found “no indication that the intelligence community distorted the evidence regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Arthur demonstrates the state-as-fact-and-run practice of responding to an article and a report which he obviously never even read. My daughter is six years old, and has better reading comprehension.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

There was not an imminent threat from an Iraq armed with WMDs in 2003.

The argument was that we had to act before the threat became imminent. And we did just that, as postwar findings only validate that as flawed as our intell was, Saddam had the intent and capabilities of reconstituting his weapons programs within 3-5 weeks of sanctions being lifted.

You also seem confused on the point of contention, here.

There were, in fact, no WMDs at all.

Not entirely true.

And there was no relationship with al-Qaeda.

Not entirely true. In fact, you’re flatout wrong.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Ha. ha. ha.

The bias you mention is illustrated in spades by the ‘amendments’ and the ‘comments’. Partisan hackery beyond belief.

Far from ’150 examples’ of ‘Democrats misleading the American people’ these ‘amendments’ underscore the basic facts over and again.

There was not an imminent threat from an Iraq armed with WMDs in 2003. There were, in fact, no WMDs at all. And there was no relationship with al-Qaeda.

And, most important, the Administration knew all of this.

Cheers.

Like or Dislike: 0  0