Lurkin…

Because Christianity – and America – are built on a foundation of individual rights being primary. Liberals – otherwise more correctly known as socialists – and islam are both built on a foundation of the rights of the group being superior to the rights of the individual.

Also…check google for “hierarchy of victimization” or “hierarchy of the oppressed”…

Or go to Pat Santy’s blog http://www.drsanity.blogspot.com/
and do a search. She’s posted about it several times, once within the last week. Very elucidating.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Here’s still another one…

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/04/you-cannot-say-anything-these-days.html

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Why is it that a relgion of true peace, Christianity, is made fun of and laughed at by the MSM and “progressives, while a religion of extremely hateful individuals, violent jackanapes, gets the tag “The Religion of Peace”? True, Christianity back in the middle ages was a little rough, but not even similar to what Islam is going through now.
But the religions that all the “progressives” want to beat down? Christianity and Judaism.
Christians and Jews are evil in the eyes of progressives. But Islam…good. Last Christian or Jewish sect that sawed folks heads off? Hmmm.. I don’t recall one. However, drawing and quartering doesn’t sound like a picnic either…. but that was SEVEN HUNDRED freakin’ years ago.
And that’s where the world of Islam is…seven hundred years behind the Western worlds mores and values.
Time to drag them screaming and kicking into the 21st century.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Or this:

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/04/04/dhimmitude-report-from-the-uk/

Like or Dislike: 0  0

More about those muslims in England who are just a minor inconvenience…

http://wolfhowling.blogspot.com/2008/04/call-to-ban-building-mosques-in-britain.html

Lex sounds like one of those jihadists who’s following the recommendation of taking an anglo sounding name and then hit all the relevant blogs with pro-islam comments. Other than that, he’s got his head in the sand.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

AAAARRRRRGGGGGGGHHHH

Why won’t this @#$^%$%&^#$ thing allow me to post a link?

….

Hey, wait, maybe I can edit it in now, after it accepts my post without a link? Let’s give it a shot.

Watch and enjoy the “respect” that’s due to Islam’s female dress code.

If that doesn’t work, I give up. Just look it up yourself. It’s called “Muslim DIOR”

Enjoy.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

To be honest, Doyle probably said as much as he could to imply it was possibly an intentional Salute to terrorists without the story getting killed.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Hey Lex. I would agree that the UK is not necessarily “overrun” with Muslim immigrants yet. Altho ChrisG is correct. The Netherlands and France are experiencing the societal problems that result when the Muslim immigrants refuse to assimilate with their new country.

It is also the reason why traditional liberal leaders have been losing elections in both the Netherlands and France of late. The local population sees the danger of being dominated by “stateless” immigrants.

So this I pose to you. How do you feel about the Archbishop of Canterbury advocating a Shariah court system for your Muslim population, along side your British court system? Is it wise to carry this respect for another man’s faith into your very judicial structure?

And if you feel there is no problem a’brewing in merry ol’ England, this colonialist has to wonder why the Archbishop suggested this to begin with.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Curt asked: “Is there a religion of facing Washington five times a day for prayer? “

Well of COURSE there is. They even have their own saint:

Democrats face DC daily and pray to their false idols.

As for the Crescent story, I see Lex is doing his very best to try and change the subject.

I wonder why?

And when it comes to the problem of Islam fanaticism in Europe, no one describes the situation better than Pat Condell:

Like or Dislike: 0  0