Damn, Thom just totally killed my theory that the nutroots are driven by a sense of political alienation that blinds them to reality and fills them with hate. Now how in the world will I ever prove that theory sound again?

Oh well, I’ve gotta give kudos to him. He’s convinced me not to vote for President Bush ever again.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

LOL, you skipped right over my simple, basic question: are you going to call Chuck Hagel a liar?
Nope, you’re going to run away like a little chickensh*t coward. You wouldn’t dare, because you know you’d get your little pussy ass whipped.
F*cking faggot.
Lemme see: Hagel is a decorated, highly respected war hero.
And YOUR hero, Bush, is a chickensh*t coward who never served his country in Vietnam. He was a f*cking cheerleader at Andover prep school while John Murtha was getting shot at in the jungle in Nam.
I always find it interesting how all these true war heroes (Murtha, Cleland, Kerry, Hagel) are attacked by the chickenhawk war cheerleaders. And yet, to them, Bush is some kind of f*cking war expert.
LOL!
Oh, and as far as the 2000 and 2004 elections, they were both STOLEN by the Bush Crime Family and its allies. I’m sure that’s real funny to you Nazi goose-steppers.
What WON’T be so funny to you is when We The People rise up and overthrow this rotten-to-the-core corrupt government. Get in our way and you’ll die, mark my words.

“Every generation needs a new revolution.”
—Thomas Jefferson

Like or Dislike: 0  0

He was on that trip as part of the Senate Armed Services Committee with other committee members in which they discussed issues that are clearly related to that Committee.

McDermott and friends can make no such claim.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“Bush is head of state. That is their job, to talk to and negotiate with other heads of state. Whether you believe him to be a tyrant or not is irrevelant. If Pelosi’s, McDermott, and Dodd’s job description included talking to heads of state I would have no problem with them doing it.”So it must have driven you crazy when McCain was speaking with Mushariff and Sarkozy last week.  Your argument is silly.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

LOL! You gotta be kidding. Just like Bush has supposedly never tried to link Saddam and 9/11, huh? (He only has mentioned the topics in the same sentence thousands of times, doing his best to try to link the two topics and muddy the waters on the issue).

Ok, prove it.  Link to a post or comment on this blog in which any of the authors stated Saddam was linked to 9/11.  And your version of Bush linking Saddam to 9/11 is the fact that 9/11 and Saddam are said in the same sentence…man, you BDS tards are a funny bunch:

"No, we’ve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th,"

He has said that repeatedly but acknowledged what the latest Pentagon report says…Saddam had many connections to terrorists including AQ.  You guys spun that to mean he really meant he was involved in 9/11 when he has said nothing of the sort.  More evidence of this is in your own ignorant comment:

Oh, BTW, whatever happened to that idiotic  section on this blog that purported to show Saddam’s connection to 9/11?

There was never any section, there was and still is the category of Saddam’s connection to al-Qaeda. 

You regurgitated a load of Rush/Fox/Drudge Kool Aid crap. Never mind that Bush’s OWN 9/11 Commission said there was no Saddam/9/11 link.

Something that was never disputed by anyone here.  That commission did say there were connections tho….may want to read the whole thing sometime instead of spewing your talking points from DummiesU.

It wouldn’t make any sense anyway. Saddam ran a SECULAR state.
He was DESPISED by Bin Laden (and he in turn despised and mistrusted Al Qaeda).  You keep trying to put Saddam and Osama in bed together and you don’t know sh*t about the Middle East. To call ME "simplistic" when you babble on with your Rush/Fox News/Drudge lies and propaganda is truly laughable and nauseating. You 29 percenters are truly frightening.

ROFL….man, you really are naive aren’t you?  You’ve fallen for the whole "Saddam was secular man!  No way he would become buddies with Osama dude!" line of trash from your fellow comrades…..but hell, Clinton and his buds didn’t fall for that line of thinking in 1998 when he bombed the aspirin factory did he?  You recall why he bombed it? 

Several months later, after al Qaeda bombed two American embassies in East Africa, numerous Clinton officials cited an Iraq-al Qaeda connection as the basis for retaliatory U.S. strikes against the al Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Sudan.

On August 24, 1998, the Clinton administration made available a "senior intelligence official" who cited "strong ties between the plant and Iraq." The following day, Thomas Pickering, undersecretary of state for political affairs and one of a handful of Clinton officials involved in the decision to strike al Shifa, briefed foreign reporters at the National Press Club. He was asked directly whether he knew "of any connection between the so-called pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum and the Iraqi government in regard to production of precursors of VX" nerve gas.

Yeah, I would like to consult my notes just to be sure that what I have to say is stated clearly and correctly. We see evidence that we think is quite clear on contacts between Sudan and Iraq. In fact, al Shifa officials, early in the company’s history, we believe were in touch with Iraqi individuals associated with Iraq’s VX program.

So lets go through that Pentagon report together and you prove your case that he was too secular to dare work with those religious terrorists.

Oh, and far as "BDS" goes, it’s clear the vast majority Americans share this "ailment." The country despises your hero.

I recall the same nonsense talk in 2004….didn’t work out to well for ya then did it?  You’ve spent way too long in the BDS echo chamber son.

The country despises your hero. YOU Kool Aid drinkers are in the minority. The rest of us laugh at you robots worshipping your pathetic little  draft-dodging coward, who dragged America into a $3 trillion fiasco that has become the biggest single disaster in U.S. history.

Last I remember Bush served in the military….did you? 

Taking out a tyrant and turning a middle eastern country into a democracy with the lowest amount of casualities in any major engagement in US history  is and will always be considered a spectacular achievement by our best and brightest.  Now we have a friendly nation smack dab in the middle of our enemy……couldn’t ask for anything better.

Are you going to call him a f*cking liar? To his face? I don’t f*cking think so.

ROFL…..man, get a grip.  Are you for real or just a cartoon character…..

Perfect example of the typical far left loser….so full of hate and ignorance all you can do is spew what your 19 year old neighbor typed onto a DummiesU post.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

re:
>>>Not once has anyone on this site said that they were…

LOL! You gotta be kidding. Just like Bush has supposedly never tried to link Saddam and 9/11, huh? (He only has mentioned the topics in the same sentence thousands of times, doing his best to try to link the two topics and muddy the waters on the issue). 
Oh, BTW, whatever happened to that idiotic  section on this blog that purported to show Saddam’s connection to 9/11?
You regurgitated a load of Rush/Fox/Drudge Kool Aid crap. Never mind
that Bush’s OWN 9/11 Commission said there was no Saddam/9/11 link.
It wouldn’t make any sense anyway. Saddam ran a SECULAR state.
He was DESPISED by Bin Laden (and he in turn despised and mistrusted Al Qaeda).
You keep trying to put Saddam and Osama in bed together and you don’t know sh*t about the Middle East. To call ME "simplistic" when you babble on with your Rush/Fox News/Drudge lies and propaganda is truly laughable and nauseating. You 29 percenters are truly frightening.
Oh, and far as "BDS" goes, it’s clear the vast majority Americans share this "ailment." The country despises your hero. YOU Kool Aid drinkers are in the minority. The rest of us laugh at you robots worshipping your pathetic little  draft-dodging coward, who dragged America into a $3 trillion fiasco that has become the biggest single disaster in U.S. history.
A great deal of what I say here is no more radical than what people like Chuck Hagel have said. Are you going to call him a f*cking liar? To his face? I don’t f*cking think so.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Re: "So if Saddam is "the world’s worst leader," how come Cheney sold him the equipment to get his dilapidated oil fields up and running so he could afford to build weapons of mass destruction?""

Because when Dick Cheney did it, it was DIFFERENT.

.

Re: “Nope. Did they find the Taliban and OBL was…yup. We invaded the right country for 9/11, Afghanistan.”

I haven’t checked in a while. did we get OBL yet? It has been more than six years. Less than four years after the Japanese leadership launched the attacks on Pearl harbor, all of the Japanese leadership was dead or in US custody. Let me know.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

They are mindless robots — how else do you explain people who support these nitwits for political office?

This is going to sound snarky, but I suspect that it’s the same sort of loyalty that led people to support a particular crop of Republicans (led by Dennis Hastert) after they went to Columbia, railed against the sitting President/Administration to foreign leaders, and told that country’s military leaders to "bypass" the Executive Branch and make their wishes known directly to Congress.

(Source: GWU’s National Security Archive)

This is why this makes a lousy point of attack; the minority can almost always be counted upon to do this sort of thing, regardless of their party identity.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Nope, David L. is probably a Ron Paul/D. Kucinich supporter who is sublimating his pain by commenting on blogs.  They are mindless robots — how else do you explain people who support these nitwits for political office?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Realizing that Molly Ivins can’t possibly know that this topic is about the three Democratic stooges that allowed Saddam Hussein to use them as useful idiots….not Dick Cheney or Halliburton’s legal sale of parts through the UN for the OFF program, one wonders what david l’s excuse is for straying so off topic.

Nothing to add to the discussion about the above mentioned stooges?

Like or Dislike: 0  0