Steve: You’re working my last good nerve. How many times have I told you that I thought Pagar’s statement was clear?

I don’t dance to your tune pal and I am not required to do or say anything at your direction.

You continue to display symptoms of a psychological disorder which requires medical attention and I would encourage you to get the mental help you clearly need.

Once again, you provide further documented proof of the emotional and intellectual disorders which prevent you or your fellow Bush Deranged libs from making any meaningful, positive contribution to the much needed political dialogue.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Re: “I completely understood the point Pagar made Steve.”

Then why can’t you restate it?

You will, of course block this message as well. go ahead. I know what I said was accurate. And I know that you are censoring me to prevent my accurate description fro being read, and that you will never make yourself accountable enough to admit that pagar’s fantasy makes no sense because he is a fellow Conservative.

I have my proof. You can prevent anyone else from seeing it, but that is your power, and I accuse you of abusing it.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I completely understood the point Pagar made Steve.

You completely twisted it around to suit your prejudices.

You have wasted my time and that of every reader here who is less interested in your mental disorder than you are.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

D E L E T E D!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Steve: I’m done pampering you on this topic. Pagar’s statement is clear enough to me and your twisted restatement is nothing more than a transparent attempt to raise phony issues.

I’ll delete the next comment you leave on this thread.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Steve,
Do you have quotas in your two minutes hate for how many times you can put “conservative” in a derogatory and negative way?

If we offend you so much, why not go to Salon, DU, Kos, and others?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Let’s try this again.

I stated that pagar [post 19] made the assertion that Drudge’s posting of information regarding Prince Harry’s presence in Afghanistan was a “Leftist” plot to have him returned to the UK where it was easier to “get” him.

Conservatives here excoriated me for that re-statement of pagar’s belief, along with evaluation of it’s credibility as being nil. Each Conservative, between invective, declared how wrongly I re-stated it.

So, being cooperative and open to correction, I have repeatedly asked what the “Conservatively Correct” interpretation was.

To this point, responses to my request have been coyly written comments about the obviousness of pagar’s post, along with a few token personal insults (which on this site are tolerated, if they are directed at Liberals).

If it is so evident, why is no Conservative here capable of taking fingers to keyboard and declaring what the “right” meaning is?

My conclusion: the Conservative psoters here know how inane pagar’s conspiracy story is. But, knowing that pagar is a fellow Conservative, they are perfectly willing to lend legitimacy to the statement, since it attacks “Leftists”, and truth or accuracy is of no import to a Conservative bent on promulgating more hated of us across the blogosphere. So Conservatives post insults, but insulate themselves from the accountability of actually saying they themselves believe this inanity.

It is both cheap and the kind of moral cowardice that William F. Buckley decried, but modenr Conservative embrace.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Do you think I have nothing better to do than teach reading comprehension to liberals whose mental facilities have been damaged by Bush Derangement Syndrome?

Go see a doctor!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Once again, a dodge.

What exactly, for those of us not as enlightened as yourself, was pagar actually saying, in your own words?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

If you can’t understand plain English there is no hope for you.

Like or Dislike: 0  0