More on Obama’s Well-Considered Iraq Plan: Withdraw, Re-Invade, Whatever…

Flopping Aces has great commentary on Barack Obama’s presposterous statementthat he would withdraw American troops from Iraq and then re-invade Iraq if Al Qaeda establishes a base there after the withdrawal, and John McCain’s response. Recommended re…

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] to relive 1968 vs The Timidity of Despair [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

just shows that Obama is naive about world events. Don’t fret. Daley, Oprah and Soros won’t let him make that mistake again.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Obama is so naive and will let Al Queda and Iran gain a footholdover allof the Middle East with his ridiculous policies. Singing Kimbaya with the Mullocracy and Al Queda will only make them more dangerous. It will make us look weak. He does not get it, in the Middle East, strength will win and playing footsies will ge you killed.

YEs wehad Abu Nidal, Slaman Pak, WMD sites that were dual use facilities, WMD plans and many other goodiesin Iraq after we destroyed the Iraqi military. But the MSM and the Looney Left just ignore it.

Defeatocratic war plans:
Grab Ankles
Spread Cheeks
Wait for Al Quedato come to us
Bomb a few goats andtens
Go to court, because Al Queda is a criminal matter, not a military matter

Conservative war plans:

We Win , They loose
Use every tool to defeat the enemy (except in Bush’s compassionate Republican mode, hold back themilitaryand prolong the fight)

I kow which on I like better

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Good job David. I was just trying to educate a few off the kool aid drinking Marxists elsewhere. They seem to forget Abu Nidal being in Iraq, the “death benefits” Sadaam was making to “suicide bombers”, Buried in the news was Salman Pak training ground. Must we go on? No, we’ll keep our heads buried in the sand. There was nothing going on over there. Let’s leave and if Al Qaeda does come back, we can use the ever effective policy of the Clinton administration and take out their empty tents with a few cruise missiles. That’ll show ‘em!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“It’s too simple for a Democrat to figure out.” I don’t know if you can make things that simple. When you’re talking about the Democrats, you’re talking about a political party that causes the death of a million inconvenient potential voters a year for over thirty years and than had to use illegal aliens, dead voters, and criminals to get a Democrat elected governor in Washington State. A political party that spends millions going to court to fight Voter ID laws by claiming their members are too dumb to be able to get a photo ID – An ID that is required to cash a welfare check at any bank in America.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

We are in Iraq, and so is Al Qaeda. We leave without the adequate training of ample numbers of security forces of Iraqis necessary to fight and Al Qaeda gains a strategic and propagnda victory and a means to recruit more idiots to blow themselves up anywhere and everywhere. Iraq loses and we lose big time.
It’s too simple for a Democrat to figure out.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[Are Americans still too naive to be threatened by the same old line that Iraq is a security threat? Where did we hear this before? Yeah right! I’d rather look to the politics of the future.] by Steve Jobbs.

Yo, Steve, I dare say the soldiers on the ground in Iraq might have some stories to settle your doubts. But, here is a good article on Michael Yon’s website (he is there right now, btw), that you might read when you get a chance:

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/rubs-at-long-last-justice.htm

p.s. a stable Iraq IS part of the politics of the future, incidentally.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Are Americans still too naive to be threatened by the same old line that Iraq is a security threat? Where did we hear this before? Yeah right! I’d rather look to the politics of the future.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Love the lefties debating skills….bravo man! Bravo!

Like or Dislike: 0  0