Nope, I don’t watch Clinton News Network except on primary/debate nights as they have the best coverage. I watch all over the web, and have learned to take anything and everything with a grain of salt. Believe none of what you hear and maybe half of what you see.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Actually, the way Fox has been reporting on the election I would have to agree. It’s almost surreal, Fox has been denigrated Fred every day while CNN actually seems to be giving him kudos…..

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’m still trying to get over an above poster (Faux News) ???

Sounds like you listen to CNN the Communist New Network!

Whatever, Fred isnt out till Fred says he’s out

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Thanks for that update Melissa:

http://race42008.com/2008/01/21/fred-thompson-news/

Like or Dislike: 0  0

7 comments from you Michael in Michigan complaining about the content of my post.

In the time it took you to do all that, you could have written at least ONE substantive counter to what I have written.

But instead, you continue to complain about me…

Good Grief!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

http://race42008.com/2008/01/21/fred-thompson-news/trackback/

Apparently his mother is in very bad shape, but he hasn’t withdrawn from the debate on Thursday. Still waiting on him. I hate waiting.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“If you don’t like MY analysis, write your own!

You don’t even have to be “brilliant” to do it!”

Geez, Mike you don’t have to be such an a**hole, you know? I came here asking I thought some relevant questions and all I get is shit from you. Get over yourself.

Nice way of treating your readers and fellow republican voters.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“…more than one third of self identified conservatives rejected the ISSUES put forward by Huckabee and McCain.”

I guess this is where we differ, Mike. I read this and think to myself “WOW, 61% of conservatives are supporting the two biggest liberals in the GOP race? What the hell is going on here?”

But again, my next question is what kind of ‘conservatives’ are they? And what are their main issues. If social conservatives, why are they supporting McCain when he has not been fully pro-life, when he went against the Wisconsin Right to Life? If they are supporting Huckabee, don’t they know about his taking money from embryonic stem cell groups? If they are fiscal and are supporting them, don’t they know about McCain’s support of global warming which will have a HUGE affect on the economy. Or if Huckabee, don’t they know he is a big government tax raiser?

These are things I cannot address if all I get is “conservatives voted…”

Do you get what I’m saying?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Michael:

WHY… DO… YOU…THINK… I… GAVE… YOU… THE…LINK…TO….THE…EXIT….POLLS?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228202/

If you don’t like MY analysis, write your own!

You don’t even have to be “brilliant” to do it!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“And frankly, I think it is a VERY important story that more than one third of self identified conservatives rejected the ISSUES put forward by Huckabee and McCain.”

My point is when I see “conservative”, I have no clue what that means. Fiscal? Social? Neo-cons? Isolationists? Ron Paul conservatives? What does that tell me? Nothing.

Now, if they said “social conservatives voted…” or “fiscal conservatives voted…”, then that would tell me something.

There are many people who call themselves conservative who are supporting Mike Huckabee or John McCain, even though they are both pretty much liberals. So when I see that, I wonder, what makes them call themselves a conservative and see John McCain or Mike Huckabee as a conservative? But, I don’t get that answer, I get “conservatives voted…” Brilliant.

Like or Dislike: 0  0