16 Jan

3 Days to SC GOP Vote

[DELETED BY AUTHOR]

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Wednesday, January 16th, 2008 at 10:27 am
| 5 views

15 Responses to 3 Days to SC GOP Vote

  1. Snooper says: 1

    This crap is typical of a liberal…Huckabee is finished…Fred is going to take SC and FL.

    Rudy is finished. It is essentially a 3-man race:

    Mitt, John Fred.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. ChrisG says: 2

    Mike,

    I got a few of these calls here in Michigan. Very directed push questions and shilling for Huck. I kept answering that I would not vote for Huck in the Primaries until the call ended.

    I wish the Primaries were all held in one day. Just get it over with so we can move forward. It would cost a whole lot less money in the long run.

    On the other hand, at least in Michigan, the Republican votes will count, unlike the Democrats. There is real disenfrachisement. Yet will the Democratic voters hold their party responisble? I doubt it highly.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. bbartlog says: 3

    Rudy is finished. It is essentially a 3-man race:

    Mitt, John Fred.

    Rudy definitely looks to be on life support after his 3% finish in MI, but scoring Fred’s chances as better than Huck’s sounds like wishful thinking to me. Fred might be able to catch Huck in SC, but Huck’s national polling is currently a lot better.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Chris: It would be a HUGE mistake to have all the primaries on the same day.

    If that were the case then the candidates would simply tailor their message to the larger states and ignore flyover country altogether.

    Put aside Texas for a minute, do you really want the race decided on what California and New York state have decided?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. bbartlog says: 5

    Having some small primaries up front has some advantages. It does give the voters in those states a disproportionate impact, but it levels the playing field in terms of money somewhat. If you had a single nationwide primary, you would need to be either a celebrity or someone with $50 or better $100 million to bring to the game if you wanted to run.
    Also, so long as the early state voters are mindful of their disproportionate influence, we can assume that they will spend more time evaluating the candidates than an average voter would under a single national primary system. Presumably this makes for better choices.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. ChrisG says: 6

    Point taken. I blame the ear infection I have for lack of enthusiasm on the primaries. I see the reasoning and understand now. Thanks Mike and bbartlog.

    Of course, what do I care about being sick. According to our paranoid, spamming troll, we have paid WhiteHouse staffers to do our research for us and do not have to do any work ourselves…… Wow, hearing that was a shock! Curt, why didn’t you tell me? I spend all this time hunting down and collecting information from multiple sources by myself when I could have a staffer do it!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Chris: So that idiot Philly Steve things “we have paid WhiteHouse staffers to do our research”???

    That’s just a variation on the moonbat claim that the PRO VICTORY forces are paid and trained by Halliburton and Blackwater (you might have seen my post honoring Skye at Midnight Blue where that was asserted by the “peace” crowd, many of whom ARE being funded or subsidized by George Soros).

    Now, to the other point… I just had a somewhat testy exchange with a paid Rudy staffer over the role of the smaller states. I am all in favor of dumping the sole focus on Iowa and New Hampshire. But if Rudy does pull off what now looks like a miracle in Florida and Super Tuesday, I would hate the consequence to be a focus on the big states.

    To elaborate that point further: the Electoral College exists for the sole reason to prevent big states from using the power of their majority population to decide the chief executive.

    P.S. Try Echinaecea tea laced with zinc and fresh lemon every two hours for your ear infection. I think Sleepy Time has a brand loaded with the proper balance of botanicals and zinc.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. suek says: 8

    Or a New England cold cure…

    Juice of 2 lemons
    2 oz (1/4 C) honey
    2 oz rum

    Mix all in a 16 oz glass, and fill to top with water as hot as you can stand to drink. Mix well and drink while still hot.
    Go directly to bed.

    I’ve never decided if this really is a cold cure or just makes you not care if you have cold. In any case, in New England, the Vitamin C of the lemons might have been a good thing in those old “traditional” days, and believe me, they warm you up for the night! My husband used to swear by them – and it turned him into a veritable radiator!

    They don’t taste especially good(imo) so there _must_ be some other reason they drank them…!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. ChrisG says: 9

    Suek,

    Thanks, I think that was also the Michigan Cure as my father used to use the same thing. My mother’s “Ohio Cure” used tea instead of water. Or was that my father’s too? After the second dose of it, I don’t care ;)

    Mike,

    Thanks also, unfortunately, this is a bacterial infection… probably from reading the multiple Steve paranoid delusional projectionist spam posts.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. I might have to try that Suek.

    The lemon is supposed to be a natural anti-bacterial as well as providing vitamin C.

    Honey is also good for coughs.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Denise says: 11

    We had the same in Iowa. They asked who you were supporting in the caucus and if you answered, they went on to trash that person and suggest Huckabee’s position.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Pingback: PoliGazette » Huckabee and Push Polling

  13. Gregory Dittman says: 12

    For fun there is a presidential calculator. My highest score was Mike Gravel (on 19 states) at 14.44%. The highest known candidate was Giuliani at 11.65%. The highest known Democrat was Clinton at 4.27%. The one I plan to vote for is at 2.28% and the least rated was McCain at .37%.
    http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Philadelphia Steve says: 13

    The calls described in the oponing monologue are usually called “push polling”. They ask a cople of questions to classify you, then go on to test your preference. If you say that you like “candidate X”, then they go on to ask, “would you still like candidate X if you knew (s)he drowned puppies for a hobby?”

    Or something along that line.

    I recall that they were used against John McCain in the 2000 Carolina primaries, usually implying he had illigitimate (non-white) children either in the US or when he was a POW in Vietnam.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Greg: I got the same score for

    Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Mittens Romney and Fred Thompson:

    A 95.65% match for each.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>