30 Dec

What Time Magazine Should Have Done

It took a media outlet from a country other then ours to name the man who IS, without a doubt, the Person Of The Year – General David Petraeus.  The UK Telegraph has crowned him:

nperson130.jpg

Today, we put him in the spotlight again by naming Gen Petraeus as The Sunday Telegraph’s Person of the Year, a new annual accolade to recognize outstanding individual achievement.

He has been the man behind the US troop surge over the past 10 months, the last-ditch effort to end Iraq’s escalating civil war by putting an extra 28,000 American troops on the ground.

So far, it has achieved what many feared was impossible. Sectarian killings are down. Al-Qaeda is on the run. And the two million Iraqis who fled the country are slowly returning. Progress in Iraq is relative – 538 civilians died last month. But compared with the 3,000 peak of December last year, it offers at least a glimmer of hope.

~~~

But the reason for picking Petraeus is simple. Iraq, whatever the current crises in Afghanistan and Pakistan, remains the West’s biggest foreign policy challenge of this decade, and if he can halt its slide into all-out anarchy, Gen Petraeus may save more than Iraqi lives.

A failed Iraq would not just be a second Vietnam, nor would it just be America’s problem.

It would be a symbolic victory for al-Qaeda, a safe haven for jihadists to plot future September 11s and July 7s, and a battleground for a Shia-Sunni struggle that could draw in the entire Middle East. Our future peace and prosperity depend, in part, on fixing this mess. And, a year ago, few had much hope.

To appreciate the scale of the task Gen Petraeus took on, it is necessary to go back to February 22, 2006. Or, as Iraqis now refer to it, their own September 11. That was when Sunni-led terrorists from al-Qaeda blew up the Shia shrine in the city of Samarra, an act of provocation that finally achieved their goal of igniting sectarian civil war.

A year on, an estimated 34,000 people had been killed on either side – some of them members of the warring Sunni and Shia militias, but most innocents tortured and killed at random. US casualties continued to rise, too, but increasingly American troops became the bystanders in a religious conflict that many believed they could no longer tame.

Except, that is, for Gen Petraeus. Despite his well-documented obsession with fitness – he starts his 18-hour days with a five-mile run – he is the opposite of the brawn-over-brain image that has dogged the US military mission in Iraq.

Top of the class of 1974 at West Point Military Academy and the holder of a PhD in international relations, he is the co author of the US military’s manual on counter-insurgency, a “warrior monk” for whom the messy intrigues of asymmetric warfare hold more interest than the straightforward challenges of 2003′s invasion.

Simply being the best and brightest soldier of his generation, however, would not be enough for Iraq in 2007, where a major part of the “surge” involves reconciling Iraq’s warring political tribes.

When the White House called, confirming him for the job, President Bush was looking not just for an outstanding leader but also a diplomat, a politician and a negotiator. It seems he got them all.

~~~

he has given another last chance to a country that had long since ceased to expect one. And for that, Gen Petraeus is Person of the Year.

Time Magazine should hang its head in shame but at least someone got it right.

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in The Iraqi War. Bookmark the permalink. Sunday, December 30th, 2007 at 5:06 pm
| 7 views

7 Responses to What Time Magazine Should Have Done

  1. crosspatch says: 1

    I just want to know what possessed Time to pick Putin in the first place. Of all people, why him?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Scrapiron says: 2

    It’s east to figure out Time. Putin = Communism, Time = support for anyone that is an enemy of America. So all of the fools should continue to buy Time and the real Americans will sink it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Amy Proctor says: 3

    Well it looks like the British press is more American than Time Magazine. Or at least more intelligent.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Amy Proctor says: 4

    I told Wordsmith I believe GEN Petraeus should also be named People Magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive for 2007.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. wordsmith says: 5

    I told Wordsmith I believe GEN Petraeus should also be named People Magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive for 2007.

    Curt,

    Don’t ask, and I won’t tell.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Sunday Night’s Odds and Sods

    From Flopping Aces we learn that The London Telegraph did what Time Magazine should have done. It named General David Petraeus it’s Person of the Year.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Scott Malensek says: 7

    “So far, it has achieved what many feared was impossible.”
    Oh MAN….truer words are rarely spoken with such accuracy, ease, and subtlety.

    “Top of the class of 1974 at West Point Military Academy and the holder of a PhD in international relations, he is the co author of the US military’s manual on counter-insurgency, a “warrior monk” for whom the messy intrigues of asymmetric warfare hold more interest than the straightforward challenges of 2003′s invasion.”

    Clark? General Clark? Has anyone heard from General Wesley Clark?

    (voice in crowd) I heard from my sister’s boyfriend’s cousin that he was into politics and pretending to know as much about the Middle East as he thinks he does about Europe. I guess he hasn’t done any work on counter-insurgency warfare, or written a book on it or anything, but he has written some political books that make him sound really good. Is that narcissism?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>