Yup, there all idiots. You want to wear tinfoil hats go right ahead but expect to laughed at.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I heard that patriots question 911 – http://patriotsquestion911.org – do you think that is baloney or what, do these guys think we’re stupid?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

TWOOFERS?! Their gaskets were probably blown a long time ago!
Are they loons? Retards? Or active agents enabling evil?
I know, they are retarded loons who are actively enabling evil! Yes look how stupid and evil they are,
http://www.ae911truth.org/
the twoofers, ha ha ha. retards.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I agree, that would be a sight to see. Unfortunately we never will see it.

The 9/11 commission did not do anywhere near a competent job of answering the questions of 9/11 and in fact made things worse. I can see where people would have questions but I have no time for those people who think remote controlled planes flew into the towers, or missiles hit the pentagon….they are loons.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Don’t get me wrong, anyone who thinks steel is rigid and full of strength until it reaches a certain temp (varying on the type of steel), and then it just instantly turns to liquid…that person is a fool. They are in deliberate denial, and that’s even worse than being foolish as a fool can’t help themselves, but a person who imagines steel just magically turns to molten orange (ignoring the power of the outdoor grill for a simple example)…that person is a fool. No doubt.

My point is that 30%+ (some polls say as high as 50% or more!) don’t believe the 911 Commission has resolved all the questions. Whether it’s Able Danger, or docs captured in Iraq, or burned bodies in the WTC lobby…it seems to me that a simple and cheap solution is to allow all these people to testify to the 911 Commission, have their say, and then let’s get an update. A lot happened between 01 and 04, and a lot MORE has happened between 04 and 07…let it out. Why not? Re-convening the 911 Commission is a CHEAP deal that both sides can find political cover in. Me, I think it’d be fun to see some of the Dems on the Commission have to sit through the twoofers, and even more fun to have them explain Able Danger, have Faruq Hijazi testify, give Izzat Ibrahim al Douri immunity and have him testify, have some of the captured Iraq docs brought forward…man, it could be REAL FUN! THIS WOULD BE A BLAST! Oh, and then trying to watch the Dem candidates (and Ron Paul) dance with the facts…omg, you guys…that’s pay per view fun there!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I think your giving these people too much benefit of the doubt Scott. Most of these nimrods are the type who believe any conspiracy they run across. They think Government is out to get them, that the Corporations run the world and that the Masons hold human sacrifice.

Those who are just ill informed but have some common sense see through these silly 9/11 conspiracies and quickly disassociate themselves with the idiocy. But the ones we hear from are the die hard tin hat wearing fools who I give no benefit of the doubt to.

They’re retards, plain and simple.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I dunno Mike. I mean, I’m sure some of the Twoofers and conspiracy theorists are intentionally seeking to undermine the war, but I hate to pigeonhole an entire demographic. More than 1/3 of Americans polled believe there was more to the attacks than the 911 Commission reported. I myself believe that (course, I believe that Saddam’s regime asked for, paid for, or otherwise sponsored them, but that’s me). A lot of intelligent people believe there’s more to 911 than has been reported. Some of these people simply have questions that were never answered (see also Able Danger). Some of these people don’t want to find the answers (see also steel melting vs steel weakening debate). The problem is that there are so many questions that really were not answered (again, even the 911 Commission members say the issue of Saddam’s regime+AQ needs to be re-examined), and at the same time…there is a lot of fear about the Bush Admin, the war, the nature of the enemy and their facelessness.

Finding the answers first requires asking the questions (which twoofers are all to happy to do, and I applaud them for that), but the second step is to accept answers (like when someone says the buildings were blown up because steel doesn’t melt until x temp and then ignores that steel doesn’t have to go liquid-it just has to lose its rigidity and act like lead; malleability is a word that is pure and simple, deliberately ignored). When people ask their questions/voice their concerns, and when they are open to answers, then we can have closure and unity. Until then…

It’s a political tool for Republicans and for Democrats (to paraphrase Barack Obama’s recent comments and Tom Daschle’s post 911 comments), and that is so wrong it’s almost immoral; clearly partisan and not patriotic.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

What’s often missing from denunciation of the Twofers stupidity is their underlying motive to confuse the American people, create doubts among the gullible and ill-informed; all with the idea of weakening our resolve to fight this war.

Even among liberals who don’t buy the Twofers idiocy, The extreme twofer position provides them some cover to pursue their own delusions about the war, about Bush and the government.

Stalin called these people “useful idiots.” But many of them are worse than that. They are active agents enabling evil.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Lp6OMZoTsB4&eurl=
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/27/video-truthers-get-a-double-dose-of-frankenmania/
Man, even Al Franken isn’t buyin it.

Like or Dislike: 0  0