Curt is doing a great job on his reporting.

Concerning ‘Glowbull’ Warming I have read so many articles on it I could start a library but Curt manages to provide new material and insights to the controversy.
This is a recent article I got of of Newmax:

Global Warming at Odds With Science

Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Monday, Aug. 6, 2007

“Two German scientists have settled it once and for all by proving conclusively that there is no such thing as a “greenhouse effect” in global climate. They’ve also proven that there can be no way of accurately measuring average global temperature in the way it is now done. CO2 cannot play the role attributed to it by the supporters of the global warming theory, and the very idea violates the laws of thermodynamics.”

It’s a good article and has a link to the peer reviewed paper:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v2.pdf.

I wonder how the EcoNazis will spin this one? Comes at a bad time as the Envirocrates trying to impliment (spin) the Carbon Trading scheme in the upcoming new energy bill, for the Envirocrates that is.

I wanted to post a message on E-the-people concerning Gore’s facade movie on glowbull warming. For some reason they won’t update my account and any message I post dissappears the next day. Could the thought police have infiltrated this website as well? I thought this website use to be objective in it’s material. It bad enough that you have websites like the Daily Crap Hole (KOS), but not E-the-People.

Keep up the great reporting Curt as I try to get the message out: Truth in media has a big Orwellian skewer in it and is being backed over coals of hype, deceit and down right lies.

Those who lose track of reality will lose their place in the world.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

So, the IPCC rated an Atlantic slowdown as “very likely” based primarily on Bryden´s single article?

This is the “very likely” that in IPCC-parlance is the same as “more than 90% probability of occurrence”?

“Very likely”, eh? Where have I heard the IPCC use that particular turn of phrase?

Oh, yes, it also happens to be the exact wording used in a particular key finding: “It is very likely that human activities are causing global warming.”

Oh well, I suppose this gives some indication of the amount of research is needed for the IPCC to be convinced of something.

Like or Dislike: 0  0