Uh, I support Ron Paul, and I think you’re a jackass. If you’re even a Ron Paul supporter and not someone who’s just having fun lampooning one.
‘intuectually lazy’ – I detect another sort of laziness. Or is this some sort of sly self-parody?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Bobcanchangehisnameallhewants: Ok then, I gave you fair warning…you’re gone.

Buh bye

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Don’t you dare threaten me, Curt. And yes I acknowledge my “ad hominem” but I don’t retract my comment. It is my honest opinion. If you think I’m a troll, fine. But you’re wrong. I will also use a little “tu quoque-ing” and say y’all are calling me: immature, arrogant, RonPaulbot, and intuectually lazy. This does not help your ethos, and certainly frustrates me. Verum est factum ut ego sum prudentior quam te, sed tu es stultus. Quaeso, licit me sole! I’m very disappointed at your disability to actually take a look at the other side of the arguments and analyze them before spewing out links instead of showing any competent debating skills. It is a rule that you need to see both sides before criticizing either, but evidently you haven’t, and simply dismiss his policies before looking into his logos. Furthermore the links you supply overlook Ron Paul’s logos, and are as equally irrelevant/invalid as any of your arguments.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

CURT
THANK’S FOR CLEARING IT,
I was trying to decipher those names, that to me look like saying same thing,
I thought I was an idiot for a while trying to weight in between the 2 names
bye

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Bob is right and you are not.: Jesus….are you really this immature?

I do not allow sockpuppets here, and while I can see you are changing your username in some juvenile attempt at a gotcha the fact remains…do not change your username. Pick one and stick with it. First and only warning.

Like or Dislike: 2  0

No, the point is that you opened with ‘imbeciles’ and ‘nincompoopy’ (ad hominem much?) while resurrecting a 4 year old thread, and have since been updating your username to be ever more condescending. Frankly a little over the top; even if you’re trying to imitate an arrogant RP fanatic (of which there certainly are plenty) you might want to tone it down a notch.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

So because I’m right on the definitions and he refuses to acknowledge that and the rest of my rhetoric that makes me a troll? Or is it because you’re too closed-minded and brainwashed to step back for a second and take a new perspective?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Troll thread necro. Pretty sure you’re wasting your time here, Wordsmith. I don’t know whether this guy is an actual supporter or a deliberate troll but either way he’s not doing RP any favors and is hardly likely to listen to a word you say.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

CAN y’all believe that this post is still kept alive from MAY 16 2007 ?
this is the NEW 2012, and we are here with the same rhetoric from both sides
right in an election year, it’s no more about who’s right or wrong now,
no, it’s about virulent attacks among the future voters, there is right and wrong
in each sides, but what is important this ear is the menacing actions of IRAN, not to be just flying in the unimportant file of who will take the leadership in 2012 election, which must be by CONSERVATIVES,
JUST READING 2 OPPOSES NEWS IN FOX NEWS, ONE OF OBAMA REDUCING THE MILITARY BUDGET, AND THE OTHER ABOUT IRAN CONTINUE PURSUE OF AGENDA DARKER THAN EVER, NOTICE ONE MINUS AND ONE PLUS, ON THE WRONG SIDES
SO Y’ALL BETTER GET YOUR PRIORITY ON ONE SIDE ALONE IF YOU WANT WHAT AMERICA IS DESERVING TO GET FOR PRESIDENT, IT IS NOT WHAT YOU PERSONELY CHOOSE ON THIS ONE, BUT WHAT THE COUNTRY NEED TO WIN.
WITH GOD’S HELP, AMERICA WILL WIN

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Seriously? I’ve been brainwashed by a Constitutional man? You’re the closed-minded one brainwashed by corrupt Washington politicians and biased media. And don’t lecture me on WWII I already know more than you will ever know about it. For all I know, you’re just trolling.

Like or Dislike: 0  0