17 Apr

Can You Legislate Against Evil?

[DELETED BY AUTHOR]

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in Law Enforcement, Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Tuesday, April 17th, 2007 at 11:17 am
| 5 views

6 Responses to Can You Legislate Against Evil?

  1. Carol_Herman says: 1

    Why didn’t one kid ring the FIRE ALARM?

    Yeah. I was a kid more than fifty years ago. But back in those days it was common for teachers to show their students the FIRE ALARM BOX. And, kids were TOLD TO RING THE BELL.

    We also saw where the fire hoses were. Yes. Behind glass. But it wasn THERE. OBVIOUS. DISCUSSED.

    And, now?

    The floosies on the left seem to do great “hand-wringing” schtick after the fact.

    But you want facts? The PResident of Virginia Tech should be fired! Along with their “police chief.” If that’s chief material, then there’s something terribly wrong, here. WORSE! Parents expected this? Parents thought their kids were safe, because?

    Because left-wing propaganda is the exclusive products of academics.

    However, the spot light is on this. And, one fact you can take away is to be responsible, yourself. AND, AS SOON AS THERE’S GUNFIRE; or any insance commotion. RING THE FIRE ALARM. It will move into place, those who are really trained to keep you safer. THey’ll also see to it that buildings are evacuated. PRONTO. TONTO. They’re trained. And, they would have responded. Yes, the death toll would have been much less.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. crosspatch says: 2

    1. The kids wasn’t really your average “foreign student”. He lived in Centerville VA where his parents had a drycleaners. He had lived here since he was little … 6 or 7 years old. He grew up in Virginia.

    2. What could have made a difference is for the students to resist. If people are in a room with no escape and someone begins to shoot, we need to teach our kids that the way to survive is to rush the shooter. Knock him down, stand on the weapon, stomp him, punch him, gouge out his eyes, whatever. Resist. The days where someone was simply treatening to kill in order to get some other thing are gone. These people are just out to kill as many as they can these days. Had those students and teachers rushed the killer, sure, some might have died but the toll would have been a lot less.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. David2 says: 3

    Sorry, but rushing the shooter is simply a way to die faster. Unless everyone does it together. And it takes time to coordinate that kind of counterattack. Even Todd Beamer would tell you that.
    But you make a good point. What is the plan? There is none and that’s not good enough. Blaming conservatives and guns is not good enough. Using massacres for political purposes is not a plan. If my child hears a shot when he’s sitting in class I want him to at least have an idea what to do besides hide under the desk or jump out a third story window. He knows where to go and what to do if there is a fire. But if he hears a shot?
    It sounds ridiculous unless you are in this position. Then it would be the best idea in the world to know 1) the door to your classroom has a heavy lock and a reinforced panel 2) your teacher has a stun gun and some mace locked in his desk 3)somewhere in the building there is a safe with a gun in it and SOMEONE, maybe even a liberal administrator, who has volunteered and PLANNED to get it ahead of time and USE it if necessary to protect the children 4) If you are in the gym or the lunchroom you know to go to that room. Maybe you won’t make it. But at least you have hope and a plan. Maybe you will even be lucky and get to run away from the sound of the bullets.
    Have you ever heard of anything like this in America today? No? Why? Maybe because liberals are in charge of the education establishment and they don’t believe in war. Or guns. They do believe in victims rights. So you do have the right to jump out the window just this once. But don’t pray before you jump. It’s against school policy.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. AMR says: 4

    Cho Seung-hui was referred to counseling, had supposedly started a fire in the dorm and stalked girls, but, if true, was not arrested and expelled from VT. That would have probably prevented the murders. Seemly colleges have no consequences unless you use un-PC language. At VT one student has been arrested recently because he was carrying even thought he had a CCW. Another has written that he had a CCW but was afraid to carry on campus; if caught he would be expelled. The school had elected to remain a free fire zone, ah, gun free zone and apparently not expel those who commit violent acts. The mini-riot against the Minuteman speaker at Columbia University resulted in little punishment for the rioters. Where is the rule of law and common civility enforcemnt on today’s campuses; apparently the Broken Window Theory in not practiced at colleges.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. skye says: 5

    Was the gun registered to the shooter?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Mike says: 6

    “But don’t pray before you jump. It’s against school policy.”

    Thanks David2. I needed some humor to lighten the mood.

    I guess we’ll find out in the days ahead what happened inside that building where most of the murders occurred. It’s hard to believe that people just stood there cringing until it was their turn to get shot.

    Skye: News is that he bought these weapons but I’d wait and see what comes out in the next few days. Early reports are often wrong.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>