Comments on: Osama In The Crosshairs http://floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=osama-in-the-crosshairs Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:45:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: TampaConservative http://floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1623 TampaConservative Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:45 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1623 As a conservative I STRONLY urge ABC to correct the falsehoods and misrepresentations in the upcoming "Path to 9/11" before it is shown. And I am not the only conservative say this. John Podhoretz, conservative columnist and Fox News contributor says: The portrait of Albright is an unacceptable revision of recent history and an unfair mark on a public servant who, no matter her shortcomings, doesn't deserve to be remembered by millions of Americans as the inadvertent (and truculent) savior of Osama bin Laden. Samuel Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, also seems to have just cause for complaint. James Taranto, OpinionJournal.com editor says: The Clintonites may have a point here. A few years ago, when the shoe was on the other foot, we were happy to see CBS scotch "The Reagans." Dean Barnett, conservative commentator posting on Hugh Hewitt's blog says: One can (if one so chooses) give the filmmakers artistic license to [fabricate a scene]. But if that is what they have done, conservative analysts who back this movie as a historical document will mortgage their credibility doing so. Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday anchor says: When you put somebody on the screen and say that's Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it's slanderous, I think it's defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account. Captain's Quarters blog says:If the Democrats do not like what ABC wants to broadcast, they have every right to protest it -- and in this case, they had a point. Bill Bennett, conservative author, radio host, and TV commentator says: Look, "The Path to 9/11" is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that's no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn't happen.

As a conservative I STRONLY urge ABC to correct the falsehoods and misrepresentations in the upcoming “Path to 9/11″ before it is shown. And I am not the only conservative say this.

John Podhoretz, conservative columnist and Fox News contributor says: The portrait of Albright is an unacceptable revision of recent history and an unfair mark on a public servant who, no matter her shortcomings, doesn’t deserve to be remembered by millions of Americans as the inadvertent (and truculent) savior of Osama bin Laden. Samuel Berger, Clinton’s national security adviser, also seems to have just cause for complaint.

James Taranto, OpinionJournal.com editor says: The Clintonites may have a point here. A few years ago, when the shoe was on the other foot, we were happy to see CBS scotch “The Reagans.”

Dean Barnett, conservative commentator posting on Hugh Hewitt’s blog says: One can (if one so chooses) give the filmmakers artistic license to [fabricate a scene]. But if that is what they have done, conservative analysts who back this movie as a historical document will mortgage their credibility doing so.

Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday anchor says: When you put somebody on the screen and say that’s Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it’s slanderous, I think it’s defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account.

Captain’s Quarters blog says:If the Democrats do not like what ABC wants to broadcast, they have every right to protest it — and in this case, they had a point.

Bill Bennett, conservative author, radio host, and TV commentator says: Look, “The Path to 9/11″ is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that’s no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn’t happen.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: TexasFred http://floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1624 TexasFred Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:45 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1624 I seem to remember another POTUS that wouldn't 'pull the trigger' too... 1991, Iraq, Saddam, an "A" Team, Saddam in the 'cross hairs' and Bush 41 said NO... Imagine that...

I seem to remember another POTUS that wouldn’t ‘pull the trigger’ too…

1991, Iraq, Saddam, an “A” Team, Saddam in the ‘cross hairs’ and Bush 41 said NO…

Imagine that…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>