Comments on: Once Again, Another Biased Poll http://floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=once-again-another-biased-poll Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:11:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 10ksnooker http://floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-850 10ksnooker Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:21:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-850 I assume the antique media will finally get to 0% and viola Kerry wins Yeah !!! I am scared, aren't you?

I assume the antique media will finally get to 0% and viola Kerry wins Yeah !!!

I am scared, aren’t you?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Ed http://floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-851 Ed Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:21:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-851 Exactly some guy. Every poll shows him in the tank, they can't all be outliers. I think it's just cumulative. You can only fail so many times before even the trusting American people will no longer give an administration the benefit of the doubt. What's scary is that now the one word most used to descibe this President is "Incompetent". How do they recover from that indictment?

Exactly some guy. Every poll shows him in the tank, they can’t all be outliers. I think it’s just cumulative. You can only fail so many times before even the trusting American people will no longer give an administration the benefit of the doubt.

What’s scary is that now the one word most used to descibe this President is “Incompetent”. How do they recover from that indictment?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: some guy http://floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-852 some guy Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:21:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-852 Right on Pug. The first poll below 40% was called a fluke. Okay. The next one could have been coincidence. But weeks of polling later and he's down to 33%? The Wall Street Journal has him at 37%. The Pew poll is getting attention because it's the lowest support since Hitler, but it's not like conservative papers show much better. It's time to wake up and realize that he's going down the tubes. As you posted, Democratic leadership is only getting 34%. This is more common, but if they were going to bias it, why not boost the Dems a bit more?

Right on Pug. The first poll below 40% was called a fluke. Okay. The next one could have been coincidence. But weeks of polling later and he’s down to 33%? The Wall Street Journal has him at 37%.

The Pew poll is getting attention because it’s the lowest support since Hitler, but it’s not like conservative papers show much better. It’s time to wake up and realize that he’s going down the tubes.

As you posted, Democratic leadership is only getting 34%. This is more common, but if they were going to bias it, why not boost the Dems a bit more?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Pug http://floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-853 Pug Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:21:53 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/03/15/once-again-another-biased-poll/#comment-853 Why should they poll only registered likely voters? Bush is not running for anything. There's no election to forecast. These are just samplings of public opinion. As every poll shows similar results it gets harder make the argument you keep trying to make that everybody is just biased against poor ole W. Maybe he really isn't very popular with the public. Ever think of that?

Why should they poll only registered likely voters? Bush is not running for anything. There’s no election to forecast. These are just samplings of public opinion.

As every poll shows similar results it gets harder make the argument you keep trying to make that everybody is just biased against poor ole W. Maybe he really isn’t very popular with the public. Ever think of that?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>